BBspot


Archives
 
BBlog
Happy Thanksgiving and a BBeliever Daily Links - 11/10/11 Daily Links - 11/2/11
BBloopers
Fun at Sea
Football Fans
Great College
Top 11
Top 11 Things Geeks Would Do After Being Rescued from a Mine
PC Weenies
The Neverending Story
Gratuity Not Included
Uptime Downtime
Geek Horoscopes
Random Geek Horoscopes
Classics
How White and Nerdy Are You?
Bush Proposes Faith- Based Firewalls for Government Computers
Microsoft Purchases Evil From Satan
Slashdot Story Generator
Which OS Are You?
Teen Using MySpace to Lure Bands to Los Angeles
The BBook of Geek
Recommended
Fark
[H]ard Folding Team
The Toque
Worth 1000
Joe the Peacock
PC Weenies
Mental Floss
Smashing Games
Free Codecs
SlushFactory
Geek Press
Wil Wheaton
Jonathan Coulton
I-Mockery
Um... Things
Jokes Gallery
Funny Pictures
More Links

Monday, January 14 12:00 AM ET

Study Shows over 68% of Science Stories Have Scientific Errors

By Brian Briggs

Evanston, IL – A recent joint study by the Columbia School of Journalism and the Department of Physics showed that 68% of science stories had scientific mistakes.

Frank Albertson, a journalism professor at Columbia who ran the study, said, “It can run from simple math errors to complete fabrication of facts. Many of the journalists who cover science stories don't have the scientific background to make sure that their stories are accurate.  And whether from the pressure of deadlines or laziness, they don't do the extra work needed to make sure the stories are factual."

Albertson cited several examples of scientific errors from the study.  In one New York Times story about the asteroid that could possibly hit Mars the reporter said, “The impact could split Mars in two causing it to fall into the Sun.”

"I think the reporter has seen too many Michael Bay films," said Albertson.  "It's no laughin matter though. Many people trust the New York Times, so that story becomes fact for a lot of people, and the body of science knowledge is harmed."

Even worse was a story in the Chicago Tribune about global climate change. One passage describing the melting of the polar ice caps said, “Whales support the rising oceans, because it gives them deeper water to swim in. Sharks on the other hand would be confused by the increased volume of water.”

Albertson just shook his head sadly at that one.

Melanie Hogbarth, a science columnist for the Des Moines Register, defended scientific journalism.  She said, “You can't expect us to know everything.  Especially math, math is hard.”

The effect is widespread from local papers to glossy science magazines. “It's no wonder that American students are falling behind the rest of the world.  When they read things like, 'Snowflakes Can Cure Cancer' in the Discover. How can you blame them?” said Albertson.

Related News

Computer Intelligence Will Surpass Human Intelligence

Top 11 Worst Jobs in Science-Fiction

Turing Test Proves 2-Year-Olds Not Human

Albertson said that education of reporters was the key.  “If they were willing to learn how to use a calculator, and learn a few basic scientific principles, then it would eliminate almost half of the mistakes. Also, it'd be nice if they didn't rely on Wikipedia for their 'fact-checking.'”

The good news for reporters was that over 42% of the stories were completely accurate.
Story Options:
Related
Discuss
Share
Print
Previous Story:

Biggest Fan
Next Story:

MacWorld 2008

 
 
RSS Feed Subscribe
Follow on Twitter Follow Us on Twitter
Facebook Fan Us on Facebook
Google Buzz Follow Us on Buzz
Amazon Find the BBook

 

  Politics Contact FAQs
A
D

sharepoint survey web part - make money online

Copyright 1999-2008 by BBspot LLC
BBspot is a satire news and comedy source and meant to be funny. If you are easily offended, gullible or don't have a sense of humor we suggest you go elsewhere.